박예나 모기지 어드바이저 뉴욕 뉴저지 모기지 문의 T. 862-253-5926 / Yena Park Advisor Blog

Mortgage
Loan Specialist

뉴욕 뉴저지 커네티컷 모기지, 모기지 조정, 융자 상담문의

T. 862-253-5926

카톡바로문의

NJ Federal Court Rejects Homeowners’ Claims Under Lender-Placed Insurance Policies

Author
admin
Date
2019-04-30 14:16
Views
381
A federal district court in New Jersey has dismissed a homeowner’s claims against his mortgage servicers and the insurers that issued lender-placed insurance policies on his property.
By Steven A. Meyerowitz | April 23, 2019 at 01:00 PM
This story is reprinted with permission from the Insurance Coverage Law Center, the industry’s only comprehensive digital resource designed for insurance coverage law professionals. Visit the website to subscribe.

The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey has dismissed a homeowner’s claims against his mortgage servicers and the insurers that issued lender-placed insurance policies on his property.
The Case
The mortgage on Luigi Francese’s New Jersey home required that he maintain insurance on the property “in the amounts . . . for the periods that Lender requires.” The mortgage also provided that if he failed to maintain adequate, continuous insurance, then:

Lender may obtain insurance coverage, at Lender’s option and Borrower’s expense. . . . [S]uch coverage shall cover Lender, but might or might not protect Borrower, Borrower’s equity in the Property, or the contents of the Property, . . . and might provide greater or lesser coverage than was previously in effect. Borrower acknowledges that the cost of the [Lender] insurance coverage so obtained might significantly exceed the cost of the insurance that Borrower could have obtained.

New Jersey Insurance LawBOOK
Comprehensive, accurate & in-depth information about insurance policy law, as well as recent statutory requirements, in-depth discussions of key
insurance concepts, and a glossary of insurance terms.
Get More Information

Mr. Francese subsequently sued his mortgage loan servicers and insurers in a putative class action, alleging that they charged borrowers for “kickbacks” when buying force-placed or lender-placed hazard insurance policies (“LPIs”); that several of the defendants together undervalued losses on LPI-covered properties; and that, when his property suffered damage, the insurance proceeds had been misappropriated.

The defendants moved to dismiss.
The Court’s Decision
The court granted the defendants’ motion.

In its decision, the court first ruled that the “filed rate doctrine” – under which any filed rate approved by state insurance regulators was “per se reasonable and unassailable in judicial proceedings brought by ratepayers” – barred the kickback claims.

With respect to Mr. Francese’s insurance benefits claims, the court ruled that he failed to “plausibly plead” how he could recover the insurance proceeds when the loan servicer was the named insured under the LPI policies. The insurer paid the loan servicer after Mr. Francese’s home was damaged because that was “what the insurance contract required.”

The LPI policies, the court pointed out, contained “unambiguous terms” showing that the contracting parties had no intention to make Mr. Francese a beneficiary.

The court concluded that, in all, the parties conducted a regular business transaction authorized under both the mortgage’s terms and LPI policies, and Mr. Francese had no right to recover the insurance proceeds arising under the LPI policies.

The case is Francese v. American Modern Ins. Group, Inc., No. 2:17-2246 (D.N.J. April 16, 2019). Attorneys involved include: For LUIGI FRANCESE, Plaintiff: FREDERIC AURELIEN, LEAD ATTORNEY, THE LAW OFFICES OF FREDERIC AURELIEN, HACKETTSTOWN, NJ. For AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERICAN MODERN INSURANCE GROUP, INC., Defendants: JEFFREY MATTHEW BRENNER, LEAD ATTORNEY, POST & SCHELL PC, PHILADELPHIA, PA. For SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC, Defendant: JONATHAN E. SAMON, LEAD ATTORNEY, MCGLINCHEY STAFFORD, NEW YORK, NY. For RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant: JOY HARMON SPERLING, LEAD ATTORNEY, DAY PITNEY LLP, Parsippany, NJ.

Steven A. Meyerowitz, a Harvard Law School graduate, is the founder and president of Meyerowitz Communications Inc., a law firm marketing communications consulting company. Mr. Meyerowitz is the Director of the Insurance Coverage Law Center and editor-in-chief of journals on insurance law, banking law, bankruptcy law, energy law, government contracting law, and privacy and cybersecurity law, among other subjects. He may be contacted at smeyerowitz@meyerowitzcommunications.com.


https://www.law.com/njlawjournal/2019/04/23/new-jersey-court-rejects-homeowners-claims-under-lender-placed-insurance-policies-399-25223/?slreturn=20190330101612
Total 56
Number Title Author Date Votes Views
26
미국 시니어들, 생활비 얼마나 쓰나…65세 은퇴자 노후생활비 82만불 필요
admin | 2019.11.23 | Votes 0 | Views 443
admin 2019.11.23 0 443
25
[한면택 워싱턴 특파원 현장보고] 빚더미 위에 올라선 미국인 … 10명중 7명 생활고
admin | 2019.11.22 | Votes 0 | Views 435
admin 2019.11.22 0 435
24
미 연준 레포(Repo·환매조건부채권) 개입, 누구를 위한 것인가
admin | 2019.11.21 | Votes 0 | Views 381
admin 2019.11.21 0 381
23
미국 경기 침체를 촉발하는 두 가지 요인
admin | 2019.11.20 | Votes 0 | Views 378
admin 2019.11.20 0 378
22
美 11월 기존 주택 판매 1.9%↑…집값 상승률 2년 만에 최고
admin | 2019.11.19 | Votes 0 | Views 407
admin 2019.11.19 0 407
21
美 8월 기존주택 판매 1.3%↑…월가 예상 상회(상보)
admin | 2019.09.30 | Votes 0 | Views 285
admin 2019.09.30 0 285
20
미국의 모기지론(주택담보대출)이 지속적으로 증가해 사상 최대
admin | 2019.09.30 | Votes 0 | Views 294
admin 2019.09.30 0 294
19
미국 8월 기존주택 판매 549만채…17개월간 '최대'
admin | 2019.09.22 | Votes 0 | Views 326
admin 2019.09.22 0 326
18
[파이낸셜뉴스] "미국 주택단타매매, 예전같지 않네"
admin | 2019.09.22 | Votes 0 | Views 323
admin 2019.09.22 0 323
17
자산유동화증권 ABS/미국 서브프라임 사태/ 서브프라임 모기지
admin | 2019.09.22 | Votes 0 | Views 330
admin 2019.09.22 0 330
16
글로벌 금융위기 불렀던 美모기지론, 사상 최대
admin | 2019.09.02 | Votes 0 | Views 278
admin 2019.09.02 0 278
15
미국 7월 신규 주택 판매 12.8% 감소… 6년 간 최대
admin | 2019.09.02 | Votes 0 | Views 316
admin 2019.09.02 0 316
14
미국 모기지 시장에 11년 전 위기의 원흉이 다시 등장했다.
admin | 2019.09.02 | Votes 0 | Views 300
admin 2019.09.02 0 300
13
글로벌 채권의 4분의 1이 마이너스
admin | 2019.07.31 | Votes 0 | Views 350
admin 2019.07.31 0 350
12
프레디맥 [ Freddie Mac Company ] 요약
admin | 2019.07.15 | Votes 0 | Views 413
admin 2019.07.15 0 413
New

Address

300 Broad Ave, Palisades Park, NJ 07650