박예나 모기지 어드바이저 뉴욕 뉴저지 모기지 문의 T. 862-253-5926 / Yena Park Advisor Blog

Mortgage 
Loan Specialist

뉴욕 뉴저지 커네티컷 모기지, 모기지 조정, 융자 Loan Officer at Citizens Bank

T. 862-253-5926

NJ Federal Court Rejects Homeowners’ Claims Under Lender-Placed Insurance Policies

Author
admin
Date
2019-04-30 14:16
Views
877
A federal district court in New Jersey has dismissed a homeowner’s claims against his mortgage servicers and the insurers that issued lender-placed insurance policies on his property.
By Steven A. Meyerowitz | April 23, 2019 at 01:00 PM
This story is reprinted with permission from the Insurance Coverage Law Center, the industry’s only comprehensive digital resource designed for insurance coverage law professionals. Visit the website to subscribe.

The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey has dismissed a homeowner’s claims against his mortgage servicers and the insurers that issued lender-placed insurance policies on his property.
The Case
The mortgage on Luigi Francese’s New Jersey home required that he maintain insurance on the property “in the amounts . . . for the periods that Lender requires.” The mortgage also provided that if he failed to maintain adequate, continuous insurance, then:

Lender may obtain insurance coverage, at Lender’s option and Borrower’s expense. . . . [S]uch coverage shall cover Lender, but might or might not protect Borrower, Borrower’s equity in the Property, or the contents of the Property, . . . and might provide greater or lesser coverage than was previously in effect. Borrower acknowledges that the cost of the [Lender] insurance coverage so obtained might significantly exceed the cost of the insurance that Borrower could have obtained.

New Jersey Insurance LawBOOK
Comprehensive, accurate & in-depth information about insurance policy law, as well as recent statutory requirements, in-depth discussions of key
insurance concepts, and a glossary of insurance terms.
Get More Information

Mr. Francese subsequently sued his mortgage loan servicers and insurers in a putative class action, alleging that they charged borrowers for “kickbacks” when buying force-placed or lender-placed hazard insurance policies (“LPIs”); that several of the defendants together undervalued losses on LPI-covered properties; and that, when his property suffered damage, the insurance proceeds had been misappropriated.

The defendants moved to dismiss.
The Court’s Decision
The court granted the defendants’ motion.

In its decision, the court first ruled that the “filed rate doctrine” – under which any filed rate approved by state insurance regulators was “per se reasonable and unassailable in judicial proceedings brought by ratepayers” – barred the kickback claims.

With respect to Mr. Francese’s insurance benefits claims, the court ruled that he failed to “plausibly plead” how he could recover the insurance proceeds when the loan servicer was the named insured under the LPI policies. The insurer paid the loan servicer after Mr. Francese’s home was damaged because that was “what the insurance contract required.”

The LPI policies, the court pointed out, contained “unambiguous terms” showing that the contracting parties had no intention to make Mr. Francese a beneficiary.

The court concluded that, in all, the parties conducted a regular business transaction authorized under both the mortgage’s terms and LPI policies, and Mr. Francese had no right to recover the insurance proceeds arising under the LPI policies.

The case is Francese v. American Modern Ins. Group, Inc., No. 2:17-2246 (D.N.J. April 16, 2019). Attorneys involved include: For LUIGI FRANCESE, Plaintiff: FREDERIC AURELIEN, LEAD ATTORNEY, THE LAW OFFICES OF FREDERIC AURELIEN, HACKETTSTOWN, NJ. For AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERICAN MODERN INSURANCE GROUP, INC., Defendants: JEFFREY MATTHEW BRENNER, LEAD ATTORNEY, POST & SCHELL PC, PHILADELPHIA, PA. For SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC, Defendant: JONATHAN E. SAMON, LEAD ATTORNEY, MCGLINCHEY STAFFORD, NEW YORK, NY. For RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant: JOY HARMON SPERLING, LEAD ATTORNEY, DAY PITNEY LLP, Parsippany, NJ.

Steven A. Meyerowitz, a Harvard Law School graduate, is the founder and president of Meyerowitz Communications Inc., a law firm marketing communications consulting company. Mr. Meyerowitz is the Director of the Insurance Coverage Law Center and editor-in-chief of journals on insurance law, banking law, bankruptcy law, energy law, government contracting law, and privacy and cybersecurity law, among other subjects. He may be contacted at smeyerowitz@meyerowitzcommunications.com.


https://www.law.com/njlawjournal/2019/04/23/new-jersey-court-rejects-homeowners-claims-under-lender-placed-insurance-policies-399-25223/?slreturn=20190330101612
Total 85
NumberTitleAuthorDateVotesViews
10
서브프라임모기지 대출
admin | 2019.07.15 | Votes 0 | Views 825
admin2019.07.150825
9
서브 프라임 모기지란
admin | 2019.07.15 | Votes 0 | Views 895
admin2019.07.150895
8
미국 모기지 재융자지수
admin | 2019.05.09 | Votes 0 | Views 972
admin2019.05.090972
7
노인 홈오너 대상 리버스 모기지 피해 끊이지 않아
admin | 2019.05.03 | Votes 0 | Views 1153
admin2019.05.0301153
6
미국에서 집사기8-모기지(Mortgage, 주택담보대출)
admin | 2019.05.03 | Votes 0 | Views 2521
admin2019.05.0302521
5
크레딧 좋으면 30년간 이자 10만달러 절약
admin | 2019.05.03 | Votes 0 | Views 988
admin2019.05.030988
4
Mortgage Rates in New Jersey
admin | 2019.04.30 | Votes 0 | Views 1125
admin2019.04.3001125
3
I refinanced my mortgage after my divorce. Do I owe this extra fee?
admin | 2019.04.30 | Votes 0 | Views 856
admin2019.04.300856
2
NJ Federal Court Rejects Homeowners’ Claims Under Lender-Placed Insurance Policies
admin | 2019.04.30 | Votes 0 | Views 877
admin2019.04.300877
1
Consumer Protection Measures Strengthening State Mortgage Regulations Signed in Law
admin | 2019.04.30 | Votes 0 | Views 751
admin2019.04.300751

Address

300 Broad Ave, Palisades Park, NJ 07650